Customer Logins
Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
Customer Logins
BLOG
Mar 31, 2021
APAC perspectives on top issues facing the E&P sector
IHS Markit Upstream colleagues recently published our annual
paper that bring forth our perspectives on the top issues facing
the upstream sector. Colleagues in Asia Pacific wanted to take an
opportunity to reflect on the themes covered in that paper, and put
forward our perspectives and insights for this region.
Energy Transition in Asia Pacific
Companies within the Asia Pacific region are starting to take a
more proactive stance towards Energy Transition, given a large set
of countries within this region, have large energy import needs to
deliver energy security. With Asia Pacific governments setting net
zero mandates in 2020, there has been an immediate trickle-down
effect on how companies within their sphere look to enact on those
targets. Separately, even if all countries haven't set net-zero
targets, the linkage between energy supply needs and energy
transition are very compatible, which is therefore leading to a
wide range of upstream companies in this region setting their own
emission targets and new energy business lines. Another key
differentiator, is that National Oil Companies contribution to
government revenues in this region is relatively insignificant,
when compared to Middle-Eastern NOCs. This important distinction
allows them greater strategic autonomy to pursue new energy
mandates, so as to achieve the broader goal of energy
security.
Portfolio & Financial Resilience
Upstream companies that have a nascent government policy on energy
transition, will put greater emphasis towards oil and gas in the
near/medium term, even as that share declines in other parts of the
world, notably in Europe. Therefore, non E&P players will do
the heavy-lifting on low carbon activities, which will reduce the
burden on upstream companies who already have challenging mandate
on the domestic E&P front. However, for countries where the
pivot towards low carbon has begun, E&P players (typically the
NOC) will have to take the lead, but concerns will exist whenever
in-country E&P investments declines. Declining investment is
already a big issue within this region, as large GIOCs and
independents have largely exited the region, thereby putting
considerable burden on regional NOCs to undertake more exploration
and development activity. Put simply, there simply isn't much
financial flexibility to pursue numerous agendas at the same
time.
On the portfolio front, we are seeing a gradual recovery in the
E&P activities, with majority of the companies specializing and
focusing spend on their core basins, but attracting capital into
new areas is still very challenged. Exploration will continue to be
concentrated on proven basin upside, with companies still targeting
major plays, but also looking at under-explored plays. Near field
exploration will continue to be prominent, with short cycle barrels
incorporated in exploration strategies. Successes are starting to
emerge (ENI - Large Ken Bau gas and condensate discovery in
Vietnam; PTTEP - Successfully appraised the Lang Lebah field in
Malaysia; PETRONAS - Oil discovery in the East Java Basin in
Indonesia). In line with Energy Transition mandates, we are also
seeing companies develop new projects with CCUS or CCS in mind.
Australia has Santos looking to push FID for the Moomba CCS
project, which is aimed to be a CO2 storage hub. In Malaysia,
Petronas is looking at CCS for the Kasawari project, with the M1
field targeted as the storage site. Finally in Indonesia,
Pertamina, Repsol and BP are looking to assess CCS and CO2 EOR for
their gas projects in the country.
License to Operate and Sell Hydrocarbons
There is a growing consensus that future license to operate and
sell hydrocarbons will be increasingly tied to emissions reduction.
In Asia Pacific, countries are looking to plug gaps between
emissions and their commitments, especially as a growing number are
moving towards more significant net zero goals. Regulations on
upstream emissions are expected to tighten in many countries, but
will be dependent on the country type (Diversified economies; Net
importers). Diversified economies in the near term will have
greater flexibility to follow through on regulations, as a number
of different sectors contribute to their overall economy. On the
other hand, while net importer companies in this region will want
to have similar regulation commitments, it will be tempered by the
need to secure reliable low cost energy sources, which are still
largely delivered by hydrocarbons. However, accelerators to
tightening upstream regulations in net importer countries, are not
entirely in their hands. It will also be determined by
stakeholders, such as key countries who buy hydrocarbons, who want
to secure lower-carbon intensive barrels. In addition, partners
with net-zero mandates (i.e GIOCs), will also have a much sharper
focus on pushing forward projects that have lower carbon intensity
characteristics. Hence, supportive policies and incentives that
deliver on emissions reduction, will be critical for this region to
both operate and sell hydrocarbons.
In terms of focus areas for emissions reduction, companies will
largely focus near-term efforts on Scope 1 and 2, as this is
directly within company control, and an area they can make a
meaningful contribution to upstream sector's GHG emissions. Some
scope 3 execution plans are emerging, but generally multiple
decades away as pathways and technology to achieve those emissions
reductions remain unclear. Hence, when looking at Scope 1 and 2,
IHS Markit assessment shows that deployment of currently available
technologies can enable emission reduction by 40-60%. It is
important to caveat, that no one size fits all approach - impact
depends on emissions source and lifecycle phase of each field. For
example, North America unconventionals will require more focus on
methane for instance, while transport and logistics will be key
drivers for offshore. However, the central source of emissions for
all play types, will be power and fuel consumption use, given they
are the largest emission contributors for Scope 1 and 2 (if
routine/significant flaring and venting is not occurring).
Host Governments - Attracting and Retaining
Capital
Host governments will continue to be in a tight spot, as a large
host of governments across the globe are competing for fewer
exploration dollars. Before the March 2020 oil price collapse, we
observed host governments making improvements to procedural and
contractual terms, which was further followed with a host of
temporary changes, post March 2020. Under continued uncertainty,
more needs to be done to retain and attract capital, so we are
likely to see more permanent changes materialize across APAC.
Malaysia is leading the way on this through introducing greater
flexibility to terms through new contract types.
Is it too little too late? The first clear answer here is that the
NOCs will be in the lead, certainly by choice and definitely by
design, to backstop any decline in local private or foreign
investor capital in the E&P sector. On the other hand, we are
also seeing the re-emergence of private capital in the APAC region.
This time in the form of smaller, nimbler 'asset specialists' which
are focus on near-field opportunities and on a supportive E&P
regulatory environment. If prices continue to remain at around
$60/bbl through 2021, there will be greater incentive for companies
to scale up. However, the jury is still out on whether NOCs and
this new form of investor capital will offset IOC exits or subdued
IOC activity in many parts of this region.
In terms of which countries will emerge as sources of capital sink,
it will be those that have established infrastructures or markets
that will allow quicker monetization paths, and supplemented by
existing players that are growing their core areas. China would
clearly be on that list, given their every increasing energy
security needs, and hence they will continue to be aggressive in
exploring and developing their proven basins. Australia will have a
greater development focus (particularly onshore), but will also
have some key exploration wells planned offshore during the second
half of 2021. Malaysia will definitely see significant uptick in
activity, with key exploration wells by the major players in the
country - Petronas, Conoco Phillips, Mubadala, Shell and PTTEP. In
addition, development drilling and related activities are expected
to pick-up, with first production from Mubadala's Pegaga gas field
in Sarawak to provide backfill volumes to the MLNG facility.
Shell's further phase development of Malikai and Gumusut-Kakap,
will also be welcome additions to sustain Malaysia's oil production
levels. Finally on Indonesia, there is both a focus on improving
terms, and developing concrete plans to achieve 1 MMBOPD of oil by
2030, which will necessitate exploration activity - this will have
a more medium term impact. However, on the near-term, a high impact
well (Rencong-1), to be drilled by Repsol in the deep water portion
of the North Sumatra Basin, is generating interest, with recent
awards to Premier and Mubadala. Rencong 1 will target an unproven
carbonate ramp over a basement high, and if successful, it will
open up the area for further exploration. So, overall, while the
region doesn't attract the capital levels when compared to other
hotspots, we will see an upturn in activity in 2021, which will be
most welcome by all stakeholders vested in the Asia Pacific
region.
Clients can access the full report in Connect.
Learn more about our upstream solutions.
Posted 31 March 2021
This article was published by S&P Global Commodity Insights and not by S&P Global Ratings, which is a separately managed division of S&P Global.
{"items" : [
{"name":"share","enabled":true,"desc":"<strong>Share</strong>","mobdesc":"Share","options":[ {"name":"facebook","url":"https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3a%2f%2fstage.www.spglobal.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2fapac-perspectives-on-top-issues-facing-the-ep-sector.html","enabled":true},{"name":"twitter","url":"https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fstage.www.spglobal.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2fapac-perspectives-on-top-issues-facing-the-ep-sector.html&text=APAC+perspectives+on+top+issues+facing+the+E%26P+sector+%7c+S%26P+Global+","enabled":true},{"name":"linkedin","url":"https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=http%3a%2f%2fstage.www.spglobal.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2fapac-perspectives-on-top-issues-facing-the-ep-sector.html","enabled":true},{"name":"email","url":"?subject=APAC perspectives on top issues facing the E&P sector | S&P Global &body=http%3a%2f%2fstage.www.spglobal.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2fapac-perspectives-on-top-issues-facing-the-ep-sector.html","enabled":true},{"name":"whatsapp","url":"https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=APAC+perspectives+on+top+issues+facing+the+E%26P+sector+%7c+S%26P+Global+ http%3a%2f%2fstage.www.spglobal.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2fapac-perspectives-on-top-issues-facing-the-ep-sector.html","enabled":true}]}, {"name":"rtt","enabled":true,"mobdesc":"Top"}
]}